James Robert Kelley

WARNING:  If you don’t care for conspiracy theory or material of a pluto nature, stop reading.

I noticed a news story on the Fox News website titled “Mexico Links Sickness, Deaths to Swine Flu.” It caused my tin-foil meter to rise when I read:

All seven U.S. victims recovered from a strain of the flu that combines pig, bird and human viruses in a way that researchers have not seen before.

That alone made me wonder if the virus was engineered or weaponized.  The article goes on to state that the flu virus has claimed at least 16 people so far in Mexico, so it has potential to be deadly.  The virus is communicable, as seen from the following statement:

The U.S. cases are a growing medical mystery because it’s unclear how they caught the virus. The CDC said none of the seven people were in contact with pigs, which is how people usually catch swine flu. And only a few were in contact with each other.

Considering it is a combination of several flu viruses, including avian and human, the virus is different than traditional swine flu.  This could account for the infection rate, but the nature of the various strains that constitute the virus is even more puzzling if it were naturally occurring:

CDC officials described the virus as having a unique combination of gene segments not seen in people or pigs before. The bug contains human virus, avian virus from North America and pig viruses from North America, Europe and Asia.

Viruses will combine and form new strains if a host is infected with more than one strain.  Let’s say a pig is infected with the swine flu, has contact with humans and eats a bird; you could see a naturally occurring strain containing components from each variant.  The last part of the quote above makes this exceptionally improbable event seem impossible.  The swine flu is actually composed of variants from North America, Europe and Asia.  Little piggies traveling to three continents to get infected seem unlikely.

After digesting that information I started to wonder the source of such a virus.  The next quote gave me a clue:

The cases were detected under unusual circumstances. One was seen at a Navy clinic that participates in a specialized disease detection network, and the other was caught through a specialized surveillance system set up in border communities, CDC officials said.

Don’t go looking in the article for that quote, it isn’t there.  When I first read the article I read the quote, and started thinking about how both cases were detected via government programs.  One being a Navy clinic and the other part of a specialized surveillance system set up in border communities.  Both of these would seem to have connections to military or security infrastructure.  Both were also have connections to research facilities that would be capable of altering virus genetics.

The fact that you won’t find this information in the article indicates someone was unhappy that the information was there.  It was removed quickly, because by the time a link to the article was read by a friend the information was removed.  Here is a screen shot of the article as it stands while this blog post if being written:

Not wanting to look like a raving fool for suggesting that Fox News would remove information that could indicate the source of the virus, I attempted to find the original text.  There was one version still existing on the Internet according to Google, the image below is a screen shot after a search for +border “strain of the flu that combines pig, bird and human viruses in a way that researchers have not seen before” on Google:

I took a string from the current article, and added +border to make sure only articles with the original text was displayed.  WJZ.com had the same content as the original with a different title: Rare Swine Flu Kills 16 In Mexico, Sickens 7 In U.S. It looks like they did not get the memo.  Just in case they do, here is a screen shot of the article:

Why would they remove interesting information so quickly, unless they were commanded to remove the information by someone who saw it as a potential risk?

Attached is the Internet Explorer “Save As” copied pages of the two sites, zipped.  They are only here in case the sites change more and you want to be able to reference how the content was when this blog post was written:

foxnews_com-mexico-links-sickness-deaths-to-swine-flu-cold-flu

What is going on with Fox News? Fox News used to consume a major portion of my time, as I watched the channel starting with Bill O’Reilly and wouldn’t turn the TV off until after midnight. I was a staunch defender of Fox News at the time, now I wonder if I was brain washed, as many times I would doze off while the news segments were running.

Now I have some proof of this, their constant hypnotic affirmations of “Fair and Balanced” have proven to be untrue. Over the summer I became a Ron Paul supporter, mainly due to my disaffection with overly groomed politicians and Ron Paul’s desire to rid America of the IRS. This support has caused me to take a more critical look at Fox News, since they have established a pattern of minimalising Ron Paul.

The proof keeps flowing in, in the form of barring him from a debate and now the coverage of the Nevada Caucus. Here is a test; Take a glance of this Fox News coverage of the Nevada Caucus:

Now that you have taken a look, who is winning? If you guessed Romney, you score one point. Who is coming in second at this point? If you guessed McCain, you score another point. Who is coming in third? If you guessed Huckabee, you lose 10 points, because you are yet another Mass Media Moron. Ron Paul, at this point in the tabulation of votes is in third, with Entrance Polls having him come in second.

Why would Fox News show Huckabee instead of Ron Paul? Good question, maybe I’ll blog about that another day, but it does show one fact: Fox News is NOT fair or balanced.